Sandworm’s Failed DynoWiper Attack on Poland’s Energy Grid: A 2025 Nation-State Case Study
Executive Summary
In late December 2025, Polish energy infrastructure was targeted in a sophisticated cyberattack attributed to Sandworm, a notorious Russian state-sponsored hacking group. The attackers attempted to deploy 'DynoWiper', a destructive data-wiping malware, against two combined heat and power facilities and key management systems for renewable energy assets. Although the wiper aimed to erase files and render systems inoperable, Polish officials confirmed the attack was detected and mitigated before operational disruption occurred. Attribution to Sandworm, linked to Russia’s GRU, underscores continued targeting of critical infrastructure by advanced persistent threats.
This incident is highly relevant given the continued escalation of cyber operations against national infrastructure, particularly in Europe. It highlights the evolving use of destructive malware by state-backed actors and signals the necessity for robust cross-sector cyber defenses and detection mechanisms.
Why This Matters Now
The failed wiper attack against Poland’s energy sector illustrates the urgent risk posed by nation-state threat actors employing destructive malware against critical infrastructure. In a time of increased geopolitical tensions, energy and utility providers worldwide must prioritize advanced threat detection, rapid response, and effective segmentation to prevent potentially catastrophic disruptions.
Attack Path Analysis
Sandworm likely initiated the attack by compromising remote access or exploiting vulnerabilities in the energy management system. They escalated privileges to gain deeper access across operational technology environments. Lateral movement allowed them to reach critical workloads and control assets within the power grid. The attackers established command and control channels to coordinate the deployment of DynoWiper, though outbound communication may have been limited. No significant data exfiltration was observed or reported. Finally, the adversaries attempted to execute the wiper malware, aiming for maximum destruction, but the operation failed to achieve the intended impact.
Kill Chain Progression
Initial Compromise
Description
Attackers infiltrated the environment, likely via spear-phishing, supply chain compromise, or exploiting exposed services of the energy management system.
Related CVEs
CVE-2021-34473
CVSS 9.8A remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Affected Products:
Microsoft Exchange Server – 2013, 2016, 2019
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2022-41352
CVSS 9.8A remote code execution vulnerability in Zimbra Collaboration Suite that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Affected Products:
Zimbra Collaboration Suite – 8.8.15, 9.0.0
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2023-32315
CVSS 9.8A remote code execution vulnerability in Openfire that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Affected Products:
Ignite Realtime Openfire – 4.7.0, 4.7.1
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2023-42793
CVSS 9.8A remote code execution vulnerability in JetBrains TeamCity that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Affected Products:
JetBrains TeamCity – 2023.05.1, 2023.05.2
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2023-23397
CVSS 9.8A privilege escalation vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system.
Affected Products:
Microsoft Outlook – 2013, 2016, 2019, Office 365
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2023-48788
CVSS 9.8A remote code execution vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient EMS that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Affected Products:
Fortinet FortiClient EMS – 7.0.1, 7.0.2
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2024-1709
CVSS 9.8A remote code execution vulnerability in ConnectWise ScreenConnect that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Affected Products:
ConnectWise ScreenConnect – 22.4.1, 22.4.2
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wild
MITRE ATT&CK® Techniques
Disk Wipe
Data Destruction
Valid Accounts
Command and Scripting Interpreter
Impair Defenses
Obfuscated Files or Information
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution
Ingress Tool Transfer
Potential Compliance Exposure
Mapping incident impact across multiple compliance frameworks.
NIS2 Directive – Incident Handling and Business Continuity
Control ID: Art. 21(2)(c)
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model 2.0 – Device Security Enforcement
Control ID: Asset Management: Device Visibility & Monitoring
PCI DSS 4.0 – Incident Response Plan Implementation
Control ID: 12.10.1
NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 – Cybersecurity Event Reporting
Control ID: 500.15
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) – ICT Risk Management Framework
Control ID: Chapter II, Article 5
NIS2 Directive – Supply Chain Security
Control ID: Art. 21(2)(e)
Sector Implications
Industry-specific impact of the vulnerabilities, including operational, regulatory, and cloud security risks.
Oil/Energy/Solar/Greentech
Critical infrastructure targeted by Sandworm's wiper attacks on power grids requires enhanced east-west traffic security and zero trust segmentation against nation-state threats.
Utilities
Energy management systems face destructive wiper malware targeting renewable energy controls, demanding egress security, encrypted traffic protection, and anomaly detection capabilities.
Government Administration
State energy infrastructure operations require multicloud visibility, threat detection systems, and secure hybrid connectivity to defend against Russian GRU-linked destructive cyberattacks.
Computer/Network Security
Security providers must enhance inline IPS capabilities and cloud native security fabric solutions to protect critical infrastructure from advanced nation-state wiper attacks.
Sources
- Sandworm hackers linked to failed wiper attack on Poland’s energy systemshttps://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/sandworm-hackers-linked-to-failed-wiper-attack-on-polands-energy-systems/Verified
- Poland Stops Cyberattacks on Energy Infrastructurehttps://www.gov.pl/web/primeminister/poland-stops-cyberattacks-on-energy-infrastructureVerified
- ESET Research: Sandworm behind cyberattack on Poland’s power grid in late 2025https://www.welivesecurity.com/en/eset-research/eset-research-sandworm-cyberattack-poland-power-grid-late-2025/Verified
Frequently Asked Questions
Cloud Native Security Fabric Mitigations and ControlsCNSF
Zero Trust segmentation, east-west traffic controls, and runtime network enforcement would have significantly contained attacker movement, while inline IPS, cloud firewall, and centralized policy could have blocked exploit attempts and wiper deployment. Least privilege, continuous visibility, and egress enforcement together reduce the blast radius and impede destructive attacks.
Control: Cloud Native Security Fabric (CNSF) + Inline IPS (Suricata)
Mitigation: Exploit attempts and known bad payloads blocked at perimeter.
Control: Zero Trust Segmentation
Mitigation: Restricts privilege escalation by enforcing identity and least privilege at the network layer.
Control: East-West Traffic Security + Zero Trust Segmentation
Mitigation: Intra-environment movement and unauthorized access sharply constrained.
Control: Multicloud Visibility & Control + Egress Security & Policy Enforcement
Mitigation: Malicious C2 traffic detected and outbound connections prevented.
Control: Egress Security & Policy Enforcement + Encrypted Traffic (HPE)
Mitigation: Potential data theft attempts blocked and outbound flows encrypted.
Destructive actions and command execution attempts detected and potentially blocked at network layer.
Impact at a Glance
Affected Business Functions
- Energy Generation
- Energy Distribution
- Renewable Energy Management
Estimated downtime: N/A
Estimated loss: N/A
No data exposure reported; attack was detected and mitigated before causing disruption.
Recommended Actions
Key Takeaways & Next Steps
- • Implement Zero Trust Segmentation to isolate critical OT and IT assets and minimize lateral movement risk.
- • Deploy east-west traffic filtering and real-time visibility for rapid detection and containment of anomalous or malicious internal flows.
- • Apply inline IDS/IPS at cloud and hybrid environment ingress points to block exploit attempts and known bad payloads.
- • Enforce rigorous outbound (egress) security policies with centralized visibility to detect and disrupt potential C2 and exfiltration attempts.
- • Regularly review and tune identity access policies and segmentation boundaries to ensure minimum privilege and reduce the impact of credential compromise.
