✨ No need to do from scratch. Deploy a Validated Containment Architecture built for your AI platform. →Deploy a Validated Containment Architecture for your AI platform. →A Validated Containment Architecture for your AI platform. →Validated Containment Architectures are here. →Contain Threats NowExplore✨
The Priority Inversion — Why the SANS Mythos Report Has the Order Wrong
Sixty of the most respected cybersecurity experts in the world published the SANS Mythos Report in April 2026. They listed eleven priority actions for an era of AI-accelerated threats. Those actions are sound, but this paper argues that the priority ordering is inverted.
Remediation has a structural ceiling while discovery compounds exponentially. A 6.5x increase in remediation effort across more than ten thousand organizations produced worse outcomes, not better ones. Download this whitepaper to learn about the Vulnerability Deficit Equation that demands a better solution than detection: containment.
Learn why the SANS Mythos Report's priority order is inverted. Containment, governing every workload's communication paths, should be the highest priority.
What's inside the whitepaper:
Why a 6.5x increase in remediation effort across more than ten thousand organizations produced worse outcomes, not better ones — and the Vulnerability Deficit Equation that explains why the math cannot be rescued
Why the exploitation window has collapsed from 771 days in 2018 to under one day in 2026, making patching a cleanup activity rather than a defense strategy for a growing class of threats
Why 82% of intrusions in 2026 ride valid credentials through legitimate channels — a vector that no scanner, patch, or vulnerability manager can reach
The eight structural axioms that establish containment as the only architecturally sound response to AI-accelerated threats, independent of detection, vendor, or implementation
How the SANS Mythos Report's own LiteLLM case study proves that containment — not patching — was the control that determined the outcome for one Fortune Global 500 enterprise
Why Hardening (PA 8) should be elevated from HIGH to CRITICAL, and what that sequencing decision means for how your organization allocates security investment
Download Now
Fill in your details to get instant access.
Your inbox is safe. We respect your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy.
Your inbox is safe. We respect your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy.
Keep exploring
Related Resources
Five Testable Properties of a Containment Platform
Discover the five testable properties that a containment platform must offer.
Aviatrix Transparent Inspection for AWS Transit Gateways Overview
Learn how Aviatrix Transit Inspection for AWS TGW offers detailed, continuous, and non-disruptive visibility.
Validated Containment Architecture: The Fastest Path to Governed AI
Discover how Validated Containment Architectures secure AI agent workloads by containing what they can reach.
Validated Containment Architecture: Technical Guide
Explore the technical guidelines for Aviatrix Validated Containment Architectures.
Validated Containment Architecture: Secure Your AI Agents in Hours
Explore Aviatrix Validated Containment Architectures: lab-tested security blueprints for AI platforms.
Defend Your Network from Compromised AI Agents
Secure your network from compromised AI agents like the OpenAI models that breached Hugging Face.
Controlling AI Agents Without Slowing Down Your Team
Learn how you can use containment to limit AI agents' Blast Radius without slowing development.
The Cloud Security Engineer's Guide to Securing AI Agents
Learn how to secure AI agents by containing their Blast Radius through architecture.
Contain the Blast Radius of Your AI Agents
Discover why AI agents create new security risks and how containment empowers you to maximize speed and safety.
Ready to Transform your Cloud Network Security?
Manage, simplify, and secure your infrastructure across cloud providers with Aviatrix.
