Executive Summary
In early 2024, Russian state-backed threat actor Sandworm orchestrated a series of cyberattacks using multiple data-wiping malware families against Ukraine’s grain sector, education, and government organizations. These attacks involved deploying destructive wiper malware to erase data and disrupt critical operations, with the attackers leveraging lateral movement and advanced intrusion techniques to maximize impact. The campaign caused significant operational downtime, data loss, and posed a direct threat to Ukraine’s primary revenue source, severely impacting the grain production and export processes during a period of geopolitical tension.
This incident reflects a trend of increased use of wiper malware in state-sponsored cyberwarfare, targeting national critical infrastructure. Organizations globally are urged to bolster their defenses, as these techniques are being replicated by other well-resourced threat actors beyond the Ukraine conflict.
Why This Matters Now
This attack underscores the escalating risk to critical infrastructure from sophisticated state-backed groups leveraging destructive malware. As geopolitical tensions drive more aggressive cyber operations, organizations in agriculture, energy, and government face heightened threats, making urgent improvements in segmentation, visibility, and response capabilities essential.
Attack Path Analysis
Sandworm initiated the attack by gaining access to Ukrainian grain sector systems, likely through phishing or exploiting exposed cloud services. They escalated privileges within the environment, possibly leveraging misconfigured IAM roles or credential theft. Using internal access, they moved laterally across workloads and regions to expand reach. The attackers established command and control channels using encrypted or covert communication to manage operations. Though the primary intent was destruction, limited data exfiltration before wiper deployment is possible. Finally, they deployed multiple wiper malware families to irreversibly destroy critical data and disrupt operations.
Kill Chain Progression
Initial Compromise
Description
Attackers gained initial access through phishing or exploitation of exposed services, targeting poorly protected cloud workloads or credentials.
Related CVEs
CVE-2022-23176
CVSS 9.8A vulnerability in WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.
Affected Products:
WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances – 12.5.9 and earlier
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2023-42793
CVSS 9.8A critical vulnerability in JetBrains TeamCity allows remote code execution.
Affected Products:
JetBrains TeamCity – < 2023.05.4
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wildCVE-2023-23397
CVSS 9.8A vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook allows remote code execution via specially crafted emails.
Affected Products:
Microsoft Outlook – 2013 SP1, 2016, 2019, 2021, Office 365
Exploit Status:
exploited in the wild
MITRE ATT&CK® Techniques
Disk Wipe
Data Destruction
File Deletion
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation
User Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools
Valid Accounts
Potential Compliance Exposure
Mapping incident impact across multiple compliance frameworks.
PCI DSS 4.0 – Incident Response Plan
Control ID: 12.10.1
NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 – Cybersecurity Policy
Control ID: 500.03
DORA – ICT Risk Management Framework
Control ID: Art. 10
CISA ZTMM 2.0 – Comprehensive Monitoring
Control ID: Visibility and Analytics
NIS2 Directive – Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures
Control ID: Article 21
Sector Implications
Industry-specific impact of the vulnerabilities, including operational, regulatory, and cloud security risks.
Food Production
Ukraine's grain sector faces direct disruption from Sandworm data wipers, threatening global food supply chains and requiring enhanced segmentation and encrypted traffic protection.
Government Administration
Government entities targeted by state-backed data wipers need zero trust segmentation, threat detection capabilities, and multicloud visibility to prevent lateral movement attacks.
Primary/Secondary Education
Education sector requires egress security policy enforcement and anomaly detection systems to protect against data-wiping malware targeting institutional infrastructure and sensitive records.
Agriculture
Agricultural operations face critical infrastructure threats from data wipers, necessitating east-west traffic security and inline IPS protection for operational technology systems.
Sources
- Sandworm hackers use data wipers to disrupt Ukraine's grain sectorhttps://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/sandworm-hackers-use-data-wipers-to-disrupt-ukraines-grain-sector/Verified
- ESET Research: Russian APT groups, including Sandworm, continue their attacks against Ukraine with wipers and ransomwarehttps://www.eset.com/us/about/newsroom/research/eset-research-russian-apt-groups-including-sandworm-continue-their-attacks-against-ukraine-with-wipers-and-ransomware/Verified
- Wipers from Russia’s most cut-throat hackers rain destruction on Ukrainehttps://arstechnica.com/security/2025/11/wipers-from-russias-most-cut-throat-hackers-rain-destruction-on-ukraine/Verified
- Sandworm Hackers Unleash Data Wipers on Ukraine's Grain Sectorhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GODB2gOl1XoVerified
Frequently Asked Questions
Cloud Native Security Fabric Mitigations and ControlsCNSF
Applying zero trust segmentation, granular egress controls, inline threat detection, and encrypted network flows could have constrained Sandworm’s ability to move laterally, exfiltrate data, and deploy destructive wipers across the cloud environment. CNSF policies reduce attack surface and provide real-time blocking of malicious behaviors at every kill chain stage.
Control: Cloud Firewall (ACF)
Mitigation: Blocked unauthorized inbound connections to sensitive workloads.
Control: Zero Trust Segmentation
Mitigation: Restricted privilege boundaries to limit escalation paths.
Control: East-West Traffic Security
Mitigation: Blocked unauthorized inter-workload and inter-region connections.
Control: Threat Detection & Anomaly Response
Mitigation: Real-time detection of anomalous command channels and malicious traffic.
Control: Egress Security & Policy Enforcement
Mitigation: Prevents unauthorized outbound traffic or data exfiltration.
Blocks or detects propagation of wipers and unauthorized destructive actions.
Impact at a Glance
Affected Business Functions
- Agricultural Production
- Supply Chain Management
- Export Operations
Estimated downtime: 14 days
Estimated loss: $5,000,000
Potential exposure of sensitive operational data, including supply chain logistics and financial records, due to data-wiping malware attacks.
Recommended Actions
Key Takeaways & Next Steps
- • Implement zero trust network segmentation across all cloud workloads and prevent overbroad permissions.
- • Enforce strict east-west and egress filtering to stop lateral movement and data exfiltration.
- • Deploy inline threat detection and anomaly response to identify and respond to command-and-control activities in real time.
- • Ensure consistent network and workload encryption to secure data in transit and block packet sniffing.
- • Apply distributed policy controls and automated enforcement to detect, block, and quarantine destructive actions like wiper deployment.
