Executive Summary
In October 2026, CISA disclosed critical vulnerabilities in Monta's electric vehicle charging platform affecting all versions of monta.app. The vulnerabilities include missing authentication for WebSocket endpoints (CVE-2026-95102), lack of rate limiting enabling brute-force attacks (CVE-2026-97363), insufficient session management (CVE-2026-97212), and publicly exposed charging station credentials (CVE-2026-93474). These flaws allow attackers to impersonate charging stations, gain unauthorized administrative control, disrupt charging services, and potentially compromise the entire EV charging network infrastructure. The vulnerabilities affect critical energy and transportation infrastructure deployed worldwide.
This incident highlights the growing cybersecurity risks in smart city and critical infrastructure as IoT devices proliferate without adequate security controls. With electric vehicle adoption accelerating globally and charging networks becoming essential infrastructure, these vulnerabilities expose systemic weaknesses in industrial control systems that could enable nation-state actors or cybercriminals to disrupt transportation and energy systems at scale.
Why This Matters Now
Electric vehicle infrastructure is rapidly expanding as a critical component of national energy security and transportation systems. These vulnerabilities expose fundamental authentication and session management flaws that could enable coordinated attacks on charging networks, potentially disrupting transportation infrastructure and undermining public confidence in EV adoption during a critical transition period.
Attack Path Analysis
Attackers exploited Monta's EV charging infrastructure through unauthenticated WebSocket endpoints to impersonate charging stations, escalated privileges by brute-forcing predictable session identifiers, moved laterally across the charging network using exposed station credentials, maintained persistence through multiple concurrent sessions, exfiltrated sensitive charging data and user information, and ultimately disrupted charging services through denial-of-service attacks.
Kill Chain Progression
This analysis maps confirmed threat intelligence to the full cloud kill chain to show where defensive gaps would emerge as an attack progresses.
Initial Compromise
Description
Attackers exploited CVE-2026-95102 by connecting to unauthenticated WebSocket endpoints in the Monta charging platform, allowing them to impersonate legitimate charging stations without any authentication requirements.
Related CVEs
CVE-2026-95102
CVSS 9.4Missing authentication for critical function in Monta monta.app WebSocket endpoints allows attackers to impersonate charging stations and gain unauthorized administrative control.
Affected Products:
Monta monta.app – all versions
Exploit Status:
no public exploitCVE-2026-97363
CVSS 7.5Improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts in Monta monta.app WebSocket API allows denial-of-service attacks and brute-force authentication attempts.
Affected Products:
Monta monta.app – all versions
Exploit Status:
no public exploitCVE-2026-97212
CVSS 7.3Insufficient session expiration in Monta monta.app allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier, enabling session hijacking and denial-of-service attacks.
Affected Products:
Monta monta.app – all versions
Exploit Status:
no public exploitCVE-2026-93474
CVSS 6.5Insufficiently protected credentials in Monta monta.app where charging station authentication identifiers are publicly accessible via web-based mapping platforms.
Affected Products:
Monta monta.app – all versions
Exploit Status:
no public exploit
MITRE ATT&CK® Techniques
Exploit Public-Facing Application
Valid Accounts
Brute Force
Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism
Endpoint Denial of Service
Adversary-in-the-Middle
Data from Information Repositories
Potential Compliance Exposure
Mapping incident impact across multiple compliance frameworks.
PCI DSS 4.0 – Strong Authentication for Access to Cardholder Data Environment
Control ID: 8.2.1
NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 – Multi-Factor Authentication
Control ID: 500.12
DORA – ICT Risk Management Framework
Control ID: Article 8
CISA ZTMM 2.0 – Asset Management and Authentication
Control ID: Identity.AM-1
NIS2 Directive – Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures
Control ID: Article 21
ISO 27001 – User Registration and De-registration
Control ID: A.9.2.1
Sector Implications
Industry-specific impact of the vulnerabilities, including operational, regulatory, and cloud security risks.
Oil/Energy/Solar/Greentech
Critical infrastructure vulnerabilities in EV charging stations expose energy sector to unauthorized administrative control, service disruption, and compromised grid operations through authentication bypass attacks.
Transportation
WebSocket authentication flaws in charging infrastructure enable attackers to impersonate stations, disrupt transportation electrification networks, and compromise fleet charging operations through session hijacking.
Utilities
Missing authentication mechanisms in charging platforms create utility sector exposure to denial-of-service attacks, unauthorized grid access, and potential cascading failures across interconnected power systems.
Automotive
Insufficiently protected credentials in EV charging networks threaten automotive sector through compromised vehicle-to-grid communications, fleet management disruption, and supply chain security vulnerabilities.
Sources
- Monta monta.apphttps://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-274-02Verified
- Monta Official Website - EV Charging Platformhttps://www.monta.appVerified
- NIST National Vulnerability Databasehttps://nvd.nist.govVerified
Frequently Asked Questions
Cloud Native Security Fabric Mitigations and ControlsCNSF
Based on the attack progression modeled above, these are the defensive controls that would constrain each stage.
Aviatrix Zero Trust CNSF would likely reduce the blast radius of this EV charging infrastructure attack by constraining lateral movement between charging stations and limiting unauthorized access to backend management systems through microsegmentation and identity-aware controls.
Control: Cloud Native Security Fabric (CNSF)
Mitigation: Zero Trust fabric controls would likely constrain initial attack reachability by enforcing identity verification for WebSocket connections and reducing the scope of accessible endpoints from external networks.
Control: Zero Trust Segmentation
Mitigation: Zero Trust segmentation policies would likely limit the scope of privilege escalation by isolating administrative functions from operational charging systems and constraining access to management interfaces based on verified identity contexts.
Control: East-West Traffic Security
Mitigation: East-west traffic controls would likely constrain lateral movement between charging stations by enforcing workload-specific communication policies and reducing reachability across the charging network infrastructure even with harvested credentials.
Control: Multicloud Visibility & Control
Mitigation: Multicloud visibility controls would likely constrain persistent C2 channels by detecting anomalous connection patterns and limiting concurrent session establishment from compromised station identifiers across the distributed charging infrastructure.
Control: Egress Security & Policy Enforcement
Mitigation: Egress security policies would likely constrain data exfiltration by limiting outbound communication paths from charging station networks and reducing the scope of accessible backend database systems through controlled egress enforcement.
While service disruption may still occur within compromised segments, the overall impact scope would likely be constrained to isolated charging station groups rather than affecting the entire network infrastructure.
Impact at a Glance
Affected Business Functions
- Electric Vehicle Charging Operations
- Energy Distribution Management
- Transportation Infrastructure Services
- Customer Payment Processing
Estimated downtime: N/A
Estimated loss: N/A
Charging station authentication credentials and session identifiers publicly accessible, potentially exposing customer charging data and station control mechanisms to unauthorized access
Recommended Actions
Key Takeaways & Next Steps
- • Implement Zero Trust Segmentation with identity-based policies to prevent unauthorized charging station impersonation and require proper authentication for all WebSocket connections
- • Deploy Egress Security & Policy Enforcement to monitor and control outbound traffic from charging infrastructure, preventing unauthorized data exfiltration to external destinations
- • Enable Multicloud Visibility & Control to detect anomalous interactions, repeated malformed requests, and suspicious automation patterns across the charging network infrastructure
- • Implement Threat Detection & Anomaly Response capabilities to baseline normal charging station behavior and alert on brute-force attacks, excessive authentication attempts, and unauthorized session creation
- • Deploy Encrypted Traffic (HPE) protection to secure all data in transit between charging stations and backend systems, preventing packet sniffing and man-in-the-middle attacks on sensitive charging and payment data



