Executive Summary
Tajin Group, a Chinese-speaking cybercriminal organization, operates as a third-party vendor on Telegram-based guarantee marketplaces, conducting extensive phishing campaigns, payment card theft, and money laundering operations. The group has demonstrated sophisticated financial crime capabilities by testing payment cards from twelve countries on platforms like CCAvenue and Geidea, while maintaining operations across multiple guarantee marketplaces including Dabai and Xinbi. Their activities target Chinese citizens and banks, with the group depositing over 208,000 USDT as operational stakes, indicating large-scale criminal enterprise operations that pose significant risks to global financial institutions and payment processors.
This incident highlights the evolving sophistication of Chinese-language cybercriminal ecosystems and their increasing use of guarantee marketplaces as force multipliers for coordinated financial crimes. The emergence of these organized criminal networks represents a growing threat to international banking systems and demonstrates the need for enhanced cross-border cybersecurity cooperation and financial transaction monitoring.
Why This Matters Now
Chinese-language guarantee marketplaces are rapidly evolving into sophisticated criminal ecosystems that facilitate large-scale international financial fraud, requiring immediate attention from financial institutions and regulators to strengthen transaction monitoring and cross-border security cooperation against these coordinated threat networks.
Attack Path Analysis
Tajin Group conducts systematic financial fraud operations through phishing campaigns to compromise payment credentials, escalates access through payment gateway exploitation, moves laterally across financial platforms and geographic regions, maintains command and control via encrypted Telegram channels and anonymous virtual numbers, exfiltrates payment card data and financial information for monetization, and creates lasting impact through money laundering operations that affect banks, payment processors, and individuals globally.
Kill Chain Progression
This analysis maps confirmed threat intelligence to the full cloud kill chain to show where defensive gaps would emerge as an attack progresses.
Initial Compromise
Description
Tajin Group initiates phishing campaigns targeting mainland Chinese citizens and banking customers to harvest payment card credentials and personal information
MITRE ATT&CK® Techniques
Phishing: Spearphishing Link
Steal Web Session Cookie
Multi-Factor Authentication Request Generation
Exfiltration Over Web Service
Obtain Capabilities: Malware
Gather Victim Network Information: IP Addresses
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
Potential Compliance Exposure
Mapping incident impact across multiple compliance frameworks.
PCI DSS 4.0 – Network Security Controls
Control ID: Requirement 1.2.1
NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 – Cybersecurity Program
Control ID: Section 500.02(b)
DORA – ICT Risk Management Framework
Control ID: Article 8
CISA ZTMM 2.0 – Identity and Access Management
Control ID: Pillar 2
NIS2 Directive – Cybersecurity Risk Management
Control ID: Article 21(1)
GDPR – Security of Processing
Control ID: Article 32
Sector Implications
Industry-specific impact of the vulnerabilities, including operational, regulatory, and cloud security risks.
Banking/Mortgage
Direct targeting of Chinese banks through phishing campaigns and payment card theft, with extensive BIN testing across multiple countries threatening transaction security.
Financial Services
Money laundering operations exploiting payment gateways and cryptocurrency exchanges, compromising fund transfer services and payment processing platforms like CCAvenue and Geidea.
Telecommunications
Anonymous virtual numbers and Telegram usernames purchased through Fragment Market enable threat actors to bypass detection and strengthen operational security measures.
Computer/Network Security
Zero trust segmentation and encrypted traffic capabilities are critical for preventing lateral movement and data exfiltration in phishing and financial fraud campaigns.
Sources
- Tajin Group: Guarantee Marketplace Vendor Involved in Phishing and Chinese Money Laundering Grouphttps://www.recordedfuture.com/research/tajin-group-gurantee-marketplaceVerified
- Evolution of Chinese-Language Guarantee Telegram Marketplaceshttps://www.recordedfuture.com/research/chinese-language-guarantee-telegram-marketplacesVerified
- CISA Alert - Business Email Compromise and Financial Fraudhttps://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-300aVerified
- FBI IC3 2023 Internet Crime Report - Romance Scams and BEChttps://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2023_IC3Report.pdfVerified
Frequently Asked Questions
Cloud Native Security Fabric Mitigations and ControlsCNSF
Based on the attack progression modeled above, these are the defensive controls that would constrain each stage.
Aviatrix Zero Trust CNSF would constrain Tajin Group's multi-stage financial fraud operations by implementing identity-aware segmentation and controlled access paths across payment platforms. The framework would likely reduce lateral movement scope and limit unauthorized access to financial gateways and data exfiltration channels.
Control: Cloud Native Security Fabric (CNSF)
Mitigation: Identity-aware access controls would likely limit the scope of compromised credentials by constraining which cloud resources and financial platforms attackers could reach with stolen authentication data
Control: Zero Trust Segmentation
Mitigation: Microsegmentation policies would likely constrain lateral privilege expansion by isolating payment gateway workloads and limiting cross-platform credential testing across geographic financial infrastructure boundaries
Control: East-West Traffic Security
Mitigation: East-west traffic controls would likely constrain movement between payment gateway environments and financial platform workloads, reducing the attacker's reachability across diverse payment processing infrastructure and card network systems
Control: Multicloud Visibility & Control
Mitigation: Centralized visibility controls would likely constrain command and control communications by monitoring and restricting unauthorized outbound connections to external messaging platforms and anonymous communication channels from financial infrastructure
Control: Egress Security & Policy Enforcement
Mitigation: Egress filtering and data loss prevention controls would likely constrain bulk financial data exfiltration by monitoring and restricting unauthorized outbound transfers of payment card information and customer credentials
While money laundering operations would likely continue through external channels, the constrained access to payment infrastructure would reduce the scale and velocity of fraudulent transactions affecting financial institutions
Impact at a Glance
Affected Business Functions
- Financial Transaction Processing
- Customer Account Management
- Fraud Detection and Prevention
- Cross-border Payment Services
Estimated downtime: N/A
Estimated loss: N/A
Payment card data including Bank Identification Numbers (BINs) from twelve countries, personally identifiable information (PII) of mainland Chinese citizens, financial account credentials, and banking information used for money laundering operations across multiple payment platforms including CCAvenue and Geidea
Recommended Actions
Key Takeaways & Next Steps
- • Implement Zero Trust Segmentation to prevent lateral movement across financial platforms and limit blast radius of compromised payment credentials
- • Deploy Egress Security & Policy Enforcement to detect and block unauthorized data exfiltration of payment card information to external destinations
- • Enable Multicloud Visibility & Control to monitor suspicious automation patterns and repeated malformed requests across payment gateways
- • Establish Encrypted Traffic (HPE) controls to protect financial data in transit and prevent interception during payment processing workflows
- • Activate Threat Detection & Anomaly Response capabilities to identify unusual payment patterns, geographic anomalies, and coordinated fraud campaigns



