Industry Category

Computer/Network Security

Breach intelligence, attack campaigns, and threat reports targeting the Computer/Network Security sector.

1287 threat reports
Page 5 of 108
Explore Other Sectors
AccountingAerospaceAerospace/AviationAgricultureAirlines/AviationAnimationApparel/FashionArchitecture/PlanningArtificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence/Machine LearningArts/CraftsAutomotiveAviation/AerospaceBanking/MortgageBiotechnology/GreentechBlockchain/CryptocurrencyBroadcast MediaBroadcasting MediaBroadcasting/MediaBuilding MaterialsBusiness Supplies/EquipmentCapital Markets/Hedge Fund/Private EquityChemicalChemicalsCivic/Social OrganizationCivil EngineeringCloud ComputingCloud Computing/SaaSCloud Native Security Fabric (CNSF)Cloud ServicesCommercial FacilitiesCommercial Real EstateComputer GamesComputer HardwareComputer NetworkingComputer Software/EngineeringComputer/Network SecurityConstructionConsultingConsumer ElectronicsConsumer GoodsConsumer ServicesCosmeticsCosmeticsCritical ManufacturingCryptocurrenciesCryptocurrencyCustomer ServicesCybersecurityDairyDating/Personal ServicesDating/Social PlatformsDefense/SpaceDesignE-LearningEducation ManagementElectrical/Electronic ManufacturingEmergency ServicesEnergyEnergy/Oil/Solar/GreentechEntertainment/Movie ProductionEnvironmental ServicesEvents ServicesExecutive OfficeFacilities ServicesFarmingFashion/ApparelFinancial ServicesFine ArtFisheryFood ProductionFood/BeveragesFortune 500 companiesFranchisingFundraisingGambling/CasinosGamingGaming/CasinosGovernment AdministrationGovernment FacilitiesGovernment RelationsGraphic Design/Web DesignHealth Care / Life SciencesHealthcareHigher Education/AcadamiaHospitalityHospitalsHuman Resources/HRImport/ExportIndividual/Family ServicesIndustrial AutomationInformation ServicesInformation Technology/ITInsuranceInternational AffairsInternational Trade/DevelopmentInternetInvestment Banking/VentureInvestment Management/Hedge Fund/Private EquityJudicialJudiciaryLaw EnforcementLaw Practice/Law FirmsLegal ServicesLegislative OfficeLeisure/TravelLogistics/ProcurementLuxury Goods/JewelryMachineryManagement ConsultingManufacturingMaritimeMarket ResearchMarketing/Advertising/SalesMechanical or Industrial EngineeringMedia ProductionMedical EquipmentMedical PracticeMilitary IndustryMining/MetalsMobileMuseums/InstitutionsMusicNewspapers/JournalismNon-Profit/VolunteeringOil/Energy/Solar/GreentechOnline PublishingOther IndustryOutsourcing/OffshoringPackage/Freight DeliveryParkingPharmaceuticalsPhilanthropyPhotographyPlasticsPolitical OrganizationPrimary/Secondary EducationProfessional ServicesProfessional TrainingPublic Relations/PRPublic SafetyPublishing IndustryRailroad ManufactureReal Estate/MortgageRecreational Facilities/ServicesReligious InstitutionsRenewables/EnvironmentResearch IndustryRestaurantsRetail IndustryRoboticsRural HealthcareSecurity/InvestigationsSemiconductorsShipbuildingSocial Media/InternetSporting GoodsSportsStaffing/RecruitingSupermarketsTechnologyTechnology/ITTelecommunicationsThink TanksToys and GamesTransportationTravel/TourismTrucking/FreightUtilitiesVenture Capital/VCWarehousingWater and Waste ManagementWater and WastewaterWater and Wastewater SystemsWater and Wastewater TreatmentWater TreatmentWater, Waste, Steam, and Air Conditioning ServicesWater/Waste ManagementWater/WastewaterWater/Wastewater ManagementWater/Wastewater/UtilitiesWholesaleWine/SpiritsWirelessWriting/Editing

Computer/Network Security Threat Reports

Showing 49–60 / 1287 reports
Inside the CryptoBilis Hardware Implant: How Attackers Turned Trusted Crypto Wallets Into Cellular Spies
Inside the CryptoBilis Hardware Implant: How Attackers Turned Trusted Crypto Wallets Into Cellular Spies

Inside the CryptoBilis Hardware Implant: How Attackers Turned Trusted Crypto Wallets Into Cellular Spies

In October 2026, Trezor issued an urgent warning after a customer in Indonesia reported discovering an unauthorized circuit board inside a Trezor Safe 5 hardware wallet purchased from authorized Southeast Asian reseller CryptoBilis via the Tokopedia marketplace. The implanted board, positioned between the device's main board and screen, contained a cellular module and antenna capable of reading and transmitting the wallet's recovery phrase over a mobile network whenever the device was powered. Trezor revoked CryptoBilis's reseller status on October 9 and advised all buyers since March 2026 to immediately transfer funds to a newly seeded wallet, as restoring the old seed phrase on a clean device provides no protection if the phrase was already exfiltrated. This incident follows a parallel hardware-implant discovery in Ledger wallets sourced from the same reseller, prompting a Singapore Police advisory and active criminal investigations. This supply-chain hardware implant attack represents a critical escalation in cryptocurrency theft tactics, moving beyond software exploits and phishing to physical interdiction of trusted devices before they reach end users. With multiple wallet brands and retail channels implicated across Southeast Asia, the campaign signals a sophisticated, organized threat actor willing to invest in hardware-level compromise—a trend that raises the security bar for any organization relying on hardware roots of trust.

Critical impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(low)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(high)
Read report
Fragnesia + PHP2Shell: How Attackers Are Chaining CVEs to Root Government Servers
Fragnesia + PHP2Shell: How Attackers Are Chaining CVEs to Root Government Servers

Fragnesia + PHP2Shell: How Attackers Are Chaining CVEs to Root Government Servers

In late October 2026, CISA issued an urgent warning after threat actors were observed chaining two critical PHP vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, collectively tracked as PHP2Shell) with a high-severity Linux kernel privilege escalation flaw (CVE-2026-46300, dubbed Fragnesia) to implant webshells and execute commands as root. Dream Security researchers documented a campaign that successfully compromised 25 servers across the US, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea—including three in a US government-affiliated environment—using approximately 40 custom post-exploitation scripts. CISA added both vulnerability sets to its KEV Catalog and mandated patching deadlines for FCEB agencies under BOD 26-04. This exploit chain reflects a growing attacker playbook: combine an internet-facing application flaw for initial access with a local privilege escalation to achieve full root control. The campaign underscores how rapidly threat actors weaponize chained CVEs once proof-of-concept code is publicly available, compressing the window between disclosure and active exploitation to days.

Critical impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(low)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Fake Crypto App Bypasses Apple App Store Review, Drains $23K from 27 Solana Wallets
Fake Crypto App Bypasses Apple App Store Review, Drains $23K from 27 Solana Wallets

Fake Crypto App Bypasses Apple App Store Review, Drains $23K from 27 Solana Wallets

In late October 2026, a fraudulent cryptocurrency trading application named Padre Terminal was discovered on Apple's App Store, where it had been available to iOS users. The malicious app impersonated the legitimate Padre Terminal trading service (now Terminal by pump.fun), a web-only Solana meme coin platform. After unsuspecting users imported their private keys into the fake app, attackers drained funds from 27 Solana wallets, stealing approximately $23,000 in cryptocurrency. The stolen assets were traced to a single Solana address, and the attacker actively converted USDC holdings to SOL to evade potential freezing by Circle, then moved funds to a secondary wallet. The app continued draining wallets even after Apple removed it from the store. This incident is part of a growing wave of mobile crypto-drainer campaigns exploiting trusted app marketplaces. Blockchain security researchers identified at least five suspected crypto-brand impersonators simultaneously active on the App Store, some sharing common backend infrastructure, pointing to organized threat actors targeting DeFi and meme coin traders. The incident underscores that even curated app stores are not immune to sophisticated social engineering and supply chain impersonation attacks.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(high)
Read report
NetamLoader: How an Unknown APT Weaponized a Government Windows Update Pipeline in Asia
NetamLoader: How an Unknown APT Weaponized a Government Windows Update Pipeline in Asia

NetamLoader: How an Unknown APT Weaponized a Government Windows Update Pipeline in Asia

In the first half of 2026, Kaspersky researchers uncovered a sophisticated supply-chain attack targeting a customized Windows 10 build used exclusively by government entities in Asia. An unknown APT group, dubbed NetamLoader, embedded a multi-stage malicious framework inside a CAB archive disguised as a legitimate Patch My PC update package. The attack exploited AppDomainManager injection, .NET BinaryFormatter deserialization, TypeConfuseDelegate abuse, and AMSI bypass techniques across multiple XAML payload layers, ultimately deploying a C2-connected .NET plugin inside dllhost.exe. The attacker meticulously erased forensic evidence—log files, prefetch caches, and registry keys—while communicating over Cloudflare-hosted infrastructure at openaigpt4v[.]com with AES-128-CBC and HMAC-authenticated encrypted traffic. This incident underscores the growing vulnerability of sovereign operating system supply chains as more governments pursue technological independence. Attackers are actively targeting the unique update and patch management ecosystems of custom government OS builds, exploiting immature supply-chain security practices before these platforms reach operational maturity.

Critical impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(high)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(high)
Read report
Claude AI Autonomously Chains Exploits Across Chrome, Safari, Android, Windows, and Linux—What It Means for Your Security Posture
Claude AI Autonomously Chains Exploits Across Chrome, Safari, Android, Windows, and Linux—What It Means for Your Security Posture

Claude AI Autonomously Chains Exploits Across Chrome, Safari, Android, Windows, and Linux—What It Means for Your Security Posture

In October 2026, Anthropic disclosed that an unreleased version of its Claude AI model autonomously discovered and chained multiple critical vulnerabilities across Chrome, Safari, Android, Windows, and Linux—producing five working exploits with minimal human involvement. The exploit chains included a zero-click root-level RCE on Linux servers (CVE-2026-98432), data theft from a locked Android Pixel 9, remote crash of Windows systems via HTTP/3 kernel flaws, and a same-origin policy bypass on Safari. All affected vendors patched the disclosed vulnerabilities. This disclosure marks a qualitative shift in AI-assisted offensive security: frontier models are no longer limited to finding individual bugs but can now autonomously chain vulnerabilities into deployable attack sequences, compressing what once required specialized red teams into a largely automated workflow. This incident accelerates an urgent industry reckoning. As AI lowers the barrier to sophisticated exploit development, the window between vulnerability discovery and active weaponization shrinks dramatically. Security teams must prioritize continuous asset scanning, inline traffic inspection, and zero-trust segmentation to reduce attacker dwell time and lateral movement opportunities before AI-generated exploits reach production environments.

Critical impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(high)
Read report
GhostAction 2026: How a GitHub Actions Supply-Chain Campaign Targeted Developer Credentials and Cloud Access
GhostAction 2026: How a GitHub Actions Supply-Chain Campaign Targeted Developer Credentials and Cloud Access

GhostAction 2026: How a GitHub Actions Supply-Chain Campaign Targeted Developer Credentials and Cloud Access

Between October 8 and 26, 2026, the GhostAction supply-chain campaign injected malicious GitHub Actions workflow files into more than 23,000 public repositories using roughly 1,800 compromised developer accounts, pushing 72,000 commits across two escalating waves. Payloads targeted repository secrets, AWS OIDC tokens, and AI-provider API keys, while a PolinRider-derived 'font stealer' attempted to install a Node.js credential stealer on local developer machines. GitHub's platform controls blocked workflow execution, and GitGuardian found no confirmed successful runs, but stolen tokens from the October 8 wave remained active weeks later, demonstrating persistent unauthorized access across CI/CD and cloud environments. The incident illustrates how adversaries are weaponizing developer trust in automation pipelines to harvest cloud credentials at scale. With attackers now probing AWS OIDC federation and AI-API keys alongside traditional repository secrets, the attack surface extends well beyond source code into live cloud workloads—making CI/CD hygiene, token lifecycle management, and cloud egress controls a board-level priority.

High impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
The AI Relay in Your Dev Pipeline: How a Shadow Service Hijacked Codex and Claude Code at a Dozen Enterprises
The AI Relay in Your Dev Pipeline: How a Shadow Service Hijacked Codex and Claude Code at a Dozen Enterprises

The AI Relay in Your Dev Pipeline: How a Shadow Service Hijacked Codex and Claude Code at a Dozen Enterprises

In late October 2026, Symantec's Threat Hunter Team exposed a clandestine relay service that had been silently installing authentic OpenAI Codex and Anthropic Claude Code CLI tools across enterprise environments in mainland China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Malaysia since early 2026. The service routes all AI agent traffic through attacker-controlled relay infrastructure, disables execution sandboxes, enables unrestricted network access for write operations, suppresses telemetry, and replaces corporate API credentials with relay-issued tokens. At least a dozen organizations were confirmed affected, none knowingly. The relay operator gains full visibility into every prompt, file, and secret transiting the agent, and can silently alter or fabricate every model response returned to the user. This incident crystallizes the emerging shadow AI threat class: employees bypassing geographic or procurement controls introduce unauthorized AI relay infrastructure that operates with the full privileges of a developer account. As agentic AI coding tools become core to software delivery pipelines, a single compromised relay can silently manipulate code, harvest secrets, and pivot across cloud workloads—making egress policy enforcement and supply-chain visibility critical board-level concerns heading into 2027.

High impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(high)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
PHP2Shell + Fragnesia: How China-Nexus Attackers Rooted 25 Servers Through Exposed PAN-OS Management Interfaces
PHP2Shell + Fragnesia: How China-Nexus Attackers Rooted 25 Servers Through Exposed PAN-OS Management Interfaces

PHP2Shell + Fragnesia: How China-Nexus Attackers Rooted 25 Servers Through Exposed PAN-OS Management Interfaces

In late October 2026, threat actors actively exploited two critical PHP2Shell vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, CVSS 9.2) targeting internet-exposed Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management interfaces, enabling unauthenticated remote code execution. A suspected China-nexus threat actor chained these flaws with a Linux kernel local privilege escalation bug (CVE-2026-46300, Fragnesia) to root 25 servers across the U.S., Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea — including systems in a U.S. government-affiliated environment. Post-exploitation activity included PHP web shell implantation, Active Directory attacks, credential extraction, and directory enumeration, indicating deep persistence objectives. This campaign underscores the persistent danger of internet-exposed network appliance management interfaces, a vector increasingly favored by nation-state actors. The China-nexus attribution and targeting of government-adjacent infrastructure mirrors patterns seen in prior Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon operations, signaling an escalating trend of supply-chain and appliance-layer intrusions that bypass traditional endpoint defenses.

Critical impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(high)
C&CCommand & Control(high)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
CVSS 10.0 GitLab RCE (CVE-2026-97229): How a Ruby Dependency Gap Left Alpine Linux Exposed After Patching
CVSS 10.0 GitLab RCE (CVE-2026-97229): How a Ruby Dependency Gap Left Alpine Linux Exposed After Patching

CVSS 10.0 GitLab RCE (CVE-2026-97229): How a Ruby Dependency Gap Left Alpine Linux Exposed After Patching

In October 2026, a threat actor attempted to exploit CVE-2026-97229, a CVSS 10.0 remote code execution vulnerability in GitLab's Ruby-based CI/CD regex compiler (Onigmo engine), targeting Alpine Linux's self-hosted GitLab server. The attacker registered a new account on October 20, submitted crafted CI configurations, and crashed GitLab worker processes eight times over two days. Alpine had upgraded to GitLab 19.3.6 on October 22 but remained vulnerable because its server used standard Alpine Ruby rather than GitLab's bundled patched Ruby. No confirmed code execution was found, but Alpine rebuilt the server from scratch, rotated all secrets, and reset all passwords after acknowledging that a successful exploit would leave no detectable trace in logs. This incident underscores a growing gap in supply-chain patch coverage: organizations running GitLab on self-compiled or distribution-packaged Ruby installations may believe they are patched after a GitLab upgrade, while the underlying runtime dependency remains exploitable. As proof-of-concept exploit code is already public (Rapid7, October 13, 2026), any unpatched self-managed GitLab instance—especially those permitting open user registration—faces elevated and immediate risk.

Critical impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(low)
C&CCommand & Control(low)
EExfiltration(low)
IImpact(high)
Read report
Telegram Android Voice Call RCE: How a Single Missed Patch Exposed 900 Million Users to Code Execution
Telegram Android Voice Call RCE: How a Single Missed Patch Exposed 900 Million Users to Code Execution

Telegram Android Voice Call RCE: How a Single Missed Patch Exposed 900 Million Users to Code Execution

In October 2026, security startup NebuSec disclosed a critical remote code execution vulnerability in Telegram for Android affecting versions 8.6.2 through 12.10.3—a window spanning March 2022 to September 2026. The flaw resided in the MediaState message-parsing logic used during voice calls: malformed signaling packets triggered an out-of-bounds memory access in the tgcalls shared library, enabling an attacker with only a standard Telegram account to execute arbitrary code on a victim's ARM64 Android device the moment the victim answered a call. Telegram silently patched the vulnerability in version 12.10.4, released late September 2026. This incident underscores a widening attack surface in consumer-grade encrypted messaging platforms as they become critical business communication tools. AI-assisted code analysis—used by NebuSec to find the flaw—is accelerating both offensive discovery and defensive review cycles, raising the bar for security teams who must now assume adversaries can find and weaponize zero-days in broadly deployed mobile applications faster than ever before.

High impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(low)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Yoba 2026: How Fake AI Apps Used Signed Executables to Mine Crypto Undetected
Yoba 2026: How Fake AI Apps Used Signed Executables to Mine Crypto Undetected

Yoba 2026: How Fake AI Apps Used Signed Executables to Mine Crypto Undetected

Beginning in July 2026, threat actors launched a campaign dubbed 'Yoba' that distributed trojanized desktop applications impersonating OpenAI ChatGPT and Anthropic Claude tools via fake GitHub repositories. Attackers used DLL sideloading against legitimate, digitally signed OpenAI Codex and Claude executables to deploy a multi-stage malware chain—YobaDropper then YobaLoader—ultimately injecting an XMRig cryptocurrency miner into svchost.exe. Command-and-control infrastructure relied on a Telegram-seeded domain generation algorithm and Google DNS-over-HTTPS to evade traditional network monitoring, effectively hijacking victim compute resources for Monero mining while evading most endpoint and gateway defenses. The Yoba campaign reflects a rapidly maturing attacker playbook: exploiting surging enterprise and consumer interest in AI tools to socially engineer downloads, while layering DLL sideloading, DGA-based C2, and geo-fencing anti-analysis tricks to extend dwell time. As AI application adoption accelerates across industries, defenders face an expanding attack surface where trusted brand names and code-signing status can no longer serve as reliable trust signals.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(high)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(high)
Read report
Inside Claude's Sandbox: How a Researcher Turned AI Prompts into Cloud Credential Theft
Inside Claude's Sandbox: How a Researcher Turned AI Prompts into Cloud Credential Theft

Inside Claude's Sandbox: How a Researcher Turned AI Prompts into Cloud Credential Theft

In a controlled research exercise published by Bishop Fox, security researcher Chris Davis systematically probed the sandbox environment surrounding Anthropic's Claude AI model, uncovering a chain of exposures spanning container internals, process memory, and live authorization tokens. Beginning with seemingly benign queries about the sandbox's operating environment, Davis was able to extract sensitive runtime artifacts that Claude surfaced during interaction. The investigation revealed that the model's execution context lacked adequate isolation controls, enabling an adversary to pivot from conversational access to credential harvesting—demonstrating a complete kill chain from initial prompt to exfiltration of bearer tokens usable against downstream cloud services. This research arrives as enterprises accelerate GenAI adoption with insufficient runtime security controls. Agentic AI deployments, where models autonomously call APIs and access internal systems, dramatically expand the attack surface. Security teams now face a new class of threat: sandbox escapes and token exfiltration via AI interaction rather than traditional exploit code.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(low)
Read report
[ INCIDENT RESPONSE // UNDER ATTACK? ]

Stop Active Cloud Data Exfiltration

Aviatrix Rapid Containment helps teams instantly identify what data is leaving the environment, from which workload, and where it’s going — during an active breach.

Looking for threats in a different sector?

Browse All Threat Reports