Industry Category

Computer Software/Engineering

Breach intelligence, attack campaigns, and threat reports targeting the Computer Software/Engineering sector.

2541 threat reports
Page 209 of 212
Explore Other Sectors
AccountingAerospaceAerospace/AviationAgricultureAirlines/AviationAnimationApparel/FashionArchitecture/PlanningArtificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence/Machine LearningArts/CraftsAutomotiveAviation/AerospaceBanking/MortgageBiotechnology/GreentechBlockchain/CryptocurrencyBroadcast MediaBroadcasting MediaBroadcasting/MediaBuilding MaterialsBusiness Supplies/EquipmentCapital Markets/Hedge Fund/Private EquityChemicalChemicalsCivic/Social OrganizationCivil EngineeringCloud ComputingCloud Computing/SaaSCloud Native Security Fabric (CNSF)Cloud ServicesCommercial FacilitiesCommercial Real EstateComputer GamesComputer HardwareComputer NetworkingComputer Software/EngineeringComputer/Network SecurityConstructionConsultingConsumer ElectronicsConsumer GoodsConsumer ServicesCosmeticsCosmeticsCritical ManufacturingCryptocurrenciesCryptocurrencyCustomer ServicesCybersecurityDairyDating/Personal ServicesDating/Social PlatformsDefense/SpaceDesignE-LearningEducation ManagementElectrical/Electronic ManufacturingEmergency ServicesEnergyEnergy/Oil/Solar/GreentechEntertainment/Movie ProductionEnvironmental ServicesEvents ServicesExecutive OfficeFacilities ServicesFarmingFashion/ApparelFinancial ServicesFine ArtFisheryFood ProductionFood/BeveragesFortune 500 companiesFranchisingFundraisingGambling/CasinosGamingGaming/CasinosGovernment AdministrationGovernment FacilitiesGovernment RelationsGraphic Design/Web DesignHealth Care / Life SciencesHealthcareHigher Education/AcadamiaHospitalityHospitalsHuman Resources/HRImport/ExportIndividual/Family ServicesIndustrial AutomationInformation ServicesInformation Technology/ITInsuranceInternational AffairsInternational Trade/DevelopmentInternetInvestment Banking/VentureInvestment Management/Hedge Fund/Private EquityJudicialJudiciaryLaw EnforcementLaw Practice/Law FirmsLegal ServicesLegislative OfficeLeisure/TravelLogistics/ProcurementLuxury Goods/JewelryMachineryManagement ConsultingManufacturingMaritimeMarket ResearchMarketing/Advertising/SalesMechanical or Industrial EngineeringMedia ProductionMedical EquipmentMedical PracticeMilitary IndustryMining/MetalsMobileMuseums/InstitutionsMusicNewspapers/JournalismNon-Profit/VolunteeringOil/Energy/Solar/GreentechOnline PublishingOther IndustryOutsourcing/OffshoringPackage/Freight DeliveryParkingPharmaceuticalsPhilanthropyPhotographyPlasticsPolitical OrganizationPrimary/Secondary EducationProfessional ServicesProfessional TrainingPublic Relations/PRPublic SafetyPublishing IndustryRailroad ManufactureReal Estate/MortgageRecreational Facilities/ServicesReligious InstitutionsRenewables/EnvironmentResearch IndustryRestaurantsRetail IndustryRoboticsRural HealthcareSecurity/InvestigationsSemiconductorsShipbuildingSocial Media/InternetSporting GoodsSportsStaffing/RecruitingSupermarketsTechnologyTechnology/ITTelecommunicationsThink TanksToys and GamesTransportationTravel/TourismTrucking/FreightUtilitiesVenture Capital/VCWarehousingWater and Waste ManagementWater and WastewaterWater and Wastewater SystemsWater and Wastewater TreatmentWater TreatmentWater, Waste, Steam, and Air Conditioning ServicesWater/Waste ManagementWater/WastewaterWater/Wastewater ManagementWater/Wastewater/UtilitiesWholesaleWine/SpiritsWirelessWriting/Editing

Computer Software/Engineering Threat Reports

Showing 2497–2508 / 2541 reports
Lies-in-the-Loop: When AI Coding Agents Become Supply Chain Threats

Lies-in-the-Loop: When AI Coding Agents Become Supply Chain Threats

In June 2024, researchers at Checkmarx Zero demonstrated a novel supply chain attack called 'Lies-in-the-Loop' (LITL) targeting AI-assisted coding agents, specifically Anthropic's Claude Code. By leveraging prompt injection, attackers manipulated the AI into concealing malicious code execution behind benign prompts, effectively tricking human operators into approving dangerous actions. The attack exploited trust in the 'human-in-the-loop' workflow, showing that malicious context within public resources like GitHub issues could hide remote code execution triggers. Successful exploitation enabled attackers to deploy arbitrary commands and potentially introduce malicious packages into software repositories, increasing the risk of downstream supply chain compromise. This incident highlights a concerning trend: as AI coding agents are rapidly adopted, their interfaces become a ripe target for adversaries using social engineering and prompt manipulation. The attack underscores the evolving sophistication of supply chain threats, especially those that blur the lines between human fallibility and machine autonomy in development environments.

High impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(high)
Read report
Critical Chaos Mesh Vulnerabilities Enable Kubernetes Cluster Takeover (2024)

Critical Chaos Mesh Vulnerabilities Enable Kubernetes Cluster Takeover (2024)

In early June 2024, multiple critical vulnerabilities known collectively as "Chaotic Deputy" were disclosed in Chaos Mesh, a widely used open-source chaos engineering platform for Kubernetes. These bugs, including authentication bypass and privilege escalation flaws, allowed unauthorized attackers to obtain elevated access within Kubernetes clusters. Exploitation could lead to total cluster takeover, lateral movement, and the compromise of sensitive resources and data across affected environments. The disclosure prompted rapid patches from maintainers and advisories from security organizations and cloud providers due to the severe risk and broad adoption of Chaos Mesh in enterprise deployments. This incident highlights the increasing focus of attackers and researchers on the Kubernetes and supply chain ecosystem. With Kubernetes now foundational to cloud-native infrastructure, vulnerabilities in operational tools like Chaos Mesh underline the need for robust segmentation, continuous security monitoring, and timely patch management to protect against emerging threats to hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Low impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(low)
EExfiltration(low)
IImpact(low)
Read report
SXVM Ransomware PoC Reveals Next-Gen DLL Unhooking to Bypass EDR

SXVM Ransomware PoC Reveals Next-Gen DLL Unhooking to Bypass EDR

In September 2024, a novel ransomware proof-of-concept dubbed 'SXVM' showcased advanced defensive evasion capabilities through DLL unhooking, enabling it to bypass traditional endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. The threat leverages in-memory manipulation to restore .text sections of key system DLLs—effectively undoing any hooks or software breakpoints set by debuggers and security products. This approach allows ransomware operators to conceal malicious actions and access powerful Windows APIs unchecked. While initial analysis points to a low detection rate and proof-of-concept status, the technique underscores an escalating trend in ransomware sophistication and anti-forensic tactics. This incident is especially relevant as ransomware variants increasingly adopt anti-debugging and anti-EDR methods. The widespread use of DLL unhooking signals a maturing threat landscape, where attackers are continuously innovating to defeat security controls and leverage memory-based evasion techniques.

High impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(medium)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(low)
C&CCommand & Control(low)
EExfiltration(low)
IImpact(high)
Read report
Code Assistant LLM Vulnerabilities Expose New AI Supply Chain Risks (2024)

Code Assistant LLM Vulnerabilities Expose New AI Supply Chain Risks (2024)

In early 2024, multiple leading code assistant platforms powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) were found to be vulnerable to security threats such as indirect prompt injection, model misuse, and code suggestion manipulation. Attackers exploited weaknesses in prompt handling and insufficient contextual isolation, allowing harmful code or misleading content to be surfaced to end users and potentially exposing enterprise environments to supply chain risks. These risks highlight the growing attack surface in organizations leveraging AI-driven development tools, where impaired oversight can lead to deceptive or insecure code entering production systems. This incident underscores the urgency for enterprises to evaluate the deployment and integration practices for generative AI tools, particularly given the rapid rise in adoption and regulatory focus on AI safety. Attacker tactics are evolving quickly, and threat actors are increasingly targeting AI models and their usage contexts as a new cyber frontier.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(medium)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
2025 Salesforce Data Breach: Supply Chain Extortion Hits Retail Sector

2025 Salesforce Data Breach: Supply Chain Extortion Hits Retail Sector

In mid-2025, a coordinated cybercriminal campaign led by UNC6395 and affiliates of Muddled Libra targeted Salesforce tenants via a multi-stage supply chain attack stemming from infiltrated third-party integrations such as Salesloft and Drift. Attackers used advanced social engineering and process exploitation rather than technological vulnerabilities to gain access to Salesforce customer data—including sensitive records like accounts, contacts, and opportunities. The operation highlighted the growing focus on data theft extortion tactics and the use of encrypted communications, with threat actors actively marketing stolen data through Telegram channels under monikers like "Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters." The impact has been significant for retailers and digital platform users, driving urgent defensive and policy changes at Salesforce and affected enterprises. This incident underscores an accelerating threat shift in 2025: attackers are increasingly leveraging social engineering and the SaaS supply chain to circumvent traditional defenses, monetizing access through extortion rather than ransomware. The event has intensified industry efforts to tighten access controls and enforce encryption, amid persistent regulatory and law enforcement actions.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Apple’s 2025 Zero-Day Puts iOS & macOS Security in Spotlight: What You Need to Know

Apple’s 2025 Zero-Day Puts iOS & macOS Security in Spotlight: What You Need to Know

In September 2025, Apple issued urgent patches for iOS, iPadOS, and macOS in response to several critical vulnerabilities, with CVE-2025-43300 standing out due to active exploitation in sophisticated targeted attacks. The vulnerability, affecting the ImageIO component, enabled attackers to compromise devices by processing malicious image files, potentially resulting in memory corruption and enabling unauthorized access or control. Previous patches were limited to the latest OS versions, leaving older systems exposed until this coordinated rollout addressed those gaps. Apple further backported fixes to supported older releases to mitigate the heightened risk of exploitation. This incident underscores an accelerating wave of zero-day vulnerabilities leveraged in real-world attacks, highlighting the persistent threats facing major software ecosystems like Apple’s. The discovery and rapid backporting response reflects mounting regulatory and industry pressure to quickly secure even legacy platforms and close compliance gaps.

Low impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(low)
EExfiltration(low)
IImpact(low)
Read report
npm’s Largest Supply Chain Compromise: Phishing and the Fragility of Open Source Security

npm’s Largest Supply Chain Compromise: Phishing and the Fragility of Open Source Security

In June 2024, a major npm supply chain compromise saw attackers inject malicious code into 18 highly popular JavaScript packages, including chalk and debug, which together accounted for over 2.6 billion weekly downloads. The breach began with a successful phishing attack targeting a package maintainer, resulting in the theft of two-factor authentication credentials. Threat actors quickly published backdoored versions of affected packages, which were downloaded millions of times in minutes before rapid detection and disclosure limited the fallout. The immediate financial losses were low, with only minimal amounts of cryptocurrency stolen, but the operational impact included widespread remediation efforts across thousands of organizations dependent on these open-source assets. This incident exemplifies the growing risk and frequency of supply chain attacks leveraging compromised maintainers and rapid malware propagation in software registries. It highlights the urgent need for enhanced account security, ecosystem-level safeguards, and improved transparency, as such compromises are increasingly targeted by sophisticated actors and threaten the core trust mechanisms of modern digital infrastructure.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(high)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Phoenix Attack Bypasses DDR5 Rowhammer Defenses in 2025
Financial Services10 months ago

Phoenix Attack Bypasses DDR5 Rowhammer Defenses in 2025

In September 2025, researchers from ETH Zurich and Google disclosed the 'Phoenix' attack—a novel Rowhammer-based hardware vulnerability that successfully bypasses the Target Row Refresh (TRR) defenses in popular DDR5 memory chips, specifically targeting modules from market leader SK Hynix. By exploiting specific shortcomings in TRR’s sampling intervals and synchronizing access over precise refresh cycles, the Phoenix attack can reliably induce bit flips in physical memory. In controlled tests, the attack enabled researchers to gain root-level privileges on commodity systems in under two minutes, expose sensitive cryptographic keys across virtual machines, and manipulate binaries such as sudo for rapid local privilege escalation. The vulnerability, now tracked as CVE-2025-6202, impacts DDR5 modules manufactured between January 2021 and December 2024, posing industry-wide risk since current mitigations are ineffective for existing hardware. This incident stands out as it revives concerns over hardware-level attacks that are resistant to conventional software security solutions. As threats like Phoenix emerge, it highlights the rapid evolution of side-channel and privilege-escalation techniques even in the face of new hardware protections, underlining the pressing need for industry collaboration and innovation on memory security standards.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Malicious MCP Servers: How AI Supply Chain Integrations Were Weaponized in 2024

Malicious MCP Servers: How AI Supply Chain Integrations Were Weaponized in 2024

In early 2024, security researchers uncovered a novel supply chain attack exploiting the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an emerging integration layer for AI assistants. Attackers published seemingly legitimate MCP servers on public repositories such as PyPI, which, once installed by developers, silently harvested sensitive credentials, SSH keys, cloud configs, and API secrets. Data exfiltration was cleverly disguised as benign HTTP requests to plausible endpoints, while the malicious packages mimicked real productivity tools, evading both user scrutiny and common detection mechanisms. This attack leveraged implicit trust in third-party AI extensions, exposing a major blind spot for organizations integrating AI into development workflows. This breach reflects a growing trend where adversaries weaponize trusted AI integration points, mirroring techniques seen in Open Source and DevOps supply chain compromises. As enterprise AI adoption accelerates, similar threats targeting protocol-level integration, plugin ecosystems, and shadow AI deployments are expected to rise, intensifying regulatory and governance pressures around software supply chain security.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(high)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Salesloft GitHub Compromise: How a 2025 Supply-Chain Attack Rippled Across 22 Companies

Salesloft GitHub Compromise: How a 2025 Supply-Chain Attack Rippled Across 22 Companies

In mid-2025, Salesloft disclosed a significant data breach stemming from a compromise of its GitHub account linked to its Drift application. The incident was investigated by Mandiant, which attributed the activity to the threat actor group UNC6395. Attackers maintained unauthorized access from March through June 2025, enabling them to pivot laterally and potentially compromise sensitive code, data, and operational assets. The breach's supply-chain nature led to downstream impacts, reportedly affecting at least 22 distinct organizations that relied on the compromised software or APIs. This breach highlights the persistent risk posed by supply-chain compromises and stolen developer credentials within cloud ecosystems. With threat actors increasingly targeting development tools and identity-driven pipelines, organizations face mounting regulatory and operational urgency to remediate authentication weaknesses and enforce segmenting policies across their CI/CD toolchains.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(medium)
PEPrivilege Escalation(low)
LMLateral Movement(low)
C&CCommand & Control(low)
EExfiltration(medium)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Inside the 2025 Salesloft Drift SaaS Supply Chain Breach: Lessons in Token Management

Inside the 2025 Salesloft Drift SaaS Supply Chain Breach: Lessons in Token Management

In early 2025, a significant supply chain breach occurred when threat actor UNC6395 exploited a dormant OAuth token from a third-party Salesloft Drift integration within a Salesforce environment. Leveraging the compromised token—which bypassed MFA—the attacker launched automated connections from multiple unknown VPNs, enumerating CRM accounts and exfiltrating customer data, including embedded credentials. This enabled lateral movement, granting persistent, unauthorized access to hundreds of downstream client Salesforce instances and facilitating privilege escalation into additional systems via harvested secrets. The incident underscores an urgent trend of attackers exploiting inadequately governed third-party integrations, token sprawl, and absent monitoring. With growing SaaS adoption and rising API-driven architectures, identity-driven supply chain attacks have become top risks, accelerating regulatory scrutiny and industry demand for automated token hygiene, lifecycle management, and more rigorous third-party security postures.

Medium impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(high)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(medium)
Read report
Salesloft Drift OAuth Breach Compromises Salesforce: 2025 Supply Chain Attack Analysis

Salesloft Drift OAuth Breach Compromises Salesforce: 2025 Supply Chain Attack Analysis

In August 2025, a supply chain attack leveraging the Salesloft Drift integration was used to compromise customer Salesforce instances. Threat actors exploited compromised OAuth credentials between August 8-18, enabling them to perform automated, high-volume data exfiltration from sensitive Salesforce objects such as Account, Contact, Case, and Opportunity records. Following exfiltration, the attackers reportedly scanned acquired data for credentials and leveraged anti-forensic tactics, including deletion of query logs, to obscure their activities. Salesloft promptly revoked all relevant tokens and notified impacted customers, while security teams advised immediate credential rotations and log investigation for signs of compromise. This incident spotlights the risks associated with third-party SaaS integrations and highlights the sophistication of attackers targeting popular business platforms. As OAuth-based attacks and API exploitations become more common, organizations must enhance supply chain monitoring, review privilege access, and adopt zero trust principles to mitigate similar breaches.

High impact

Kill Chain

ICInitial Compromise(high)
PEPrivilege Escalation(medium)
LMLateral Movement(medium)
C&CCommand & Control(medium)
EExfiltration(high)
IImpact(high)
Read report
[ INCIDENT RESPONSE // UNDER ATTACK? ]

Stop Active Cloud Data Exfiltration

Aviatrix Rapid Containment helps teams instantly identify what data is leaving the environment, from which workload, and where it’s going — during an active breach.

Looking for threats in a different sector?

Browse All Threat Reports